10 Startups That'll Change The Asbestos Lawsuit History Industry For The Better

10 Startups That'll Change The Asbestos Lawsuit History Industry For The Better

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Many companies have gone bankrupt because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by victims. An asbestos lawyer can assist you in getting compensation.

St. Cloud asbestos lawsuit  and doctors for years warned of the dangers of asbestos exposure. Yet, industry leaders downplayed the risks. As time passed the number of people who fell ill with asbestos-related ailments.

The Third Case

Asbestos lawsuits really began to gain momentum in the 1970s, shortly after scientific studies began to link asbestos to severe illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Because these diseases often don't develop symptoms until decades after exposure, tens of thousands of lawsuits were filed. A majority of these lawsuits were brought in Texas, where favorable laws made it an ideal venue for this litigation inferno.

One of the most important cases that shaped asbestos litigation was Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos-related products in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was revealed that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, placed company profits before the safety and health of his employees. The testimony of a deposition revealed that Brown was heavily influenced the company's chief medical advisor Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was a doctor who was famous for his indifference for employees' health, was a well-known figure.

Johns Manville was found to have been aware of asbestos' dangers however, they failed to take any action to safeguard their workers. The court decided that the company was liable for the damages suffered by workers who later developed mesothelioma and other asbestos-related diseases. The court also held the company liable for damages to the families of deceased employees.



After the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that made use of this material. The majority of these claims were denied for a variety reasons. Some cases were allowed to proceed and the courts set up a set of guidelines that have governed the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s, asbestos defendants were still seeking legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to be able to argue that asbestos was not part of their product and therefore they shouldn't be held responsible for the injuries suffered by people who worked with it. These arguments were rejected, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to uphold the "asbestos product" defense.

Today, mesothelioma victims' right to seek compensation from accountable parties in a case is protected under federal and state law. However insurance companies continue combat these claims tooth and nail.